Pratt v. Pratt

207 So. 3d 375, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 19172
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 2016·No. Case No. 2D16-545·Published

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Amy Rose Pratt, the former wife, appeals the final judgment of dissolution of her marriage to Blake Edward Pratt, the former husband. We dismiss the portion of the former wife’s appeal challenging the trial court’s ruling on attorneys’ fees. See Card v. Card, 122 So.3d 436, 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (dismissing the portion of the former wife’s challenge to the final judgment of dissolution that addressed attorneys’ fees because not only was the order ambiguous as to entitlement but it also failed to set an amount of fees thereby rendering that portion of the final judgment nonfinal and nonappealable); Zuberer v. Zuberer, 28 So.3d 993, 993-94 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (dismissing as premature the challenge to the trial court’s ruling on attorneys’ fees where the trial court determined entitlement but reserved on the amount). In all other respects, the final judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part.

KHOUZAM and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pratt v. Pratt, 207 So. 3d 375, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 19172 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

207 So. 3d 375 (Pratt v. Pratt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zuberer v. Zuberer
28 So. 3d 993 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Card v. Card
122 So. 3d 436 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)