Pratt v. Parsons

43 P. 620, 13 Utah 31, 43 P.R. 620, 1896 Utah LEXIS 6
CourtUtah Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 6, 1896
DocketNo. 616
StatusPublished

This text of 43 P. 620 (Pratt v. Parsons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pratt v. Parsons, 43 P. 620, 13 Utah 31, 43 P.R. 620, 1896 Utah LEXIS 6 (Utah 1896).

Opinion

Bartch, J.:

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover a certain amount which he claims is due him under the terms of a contract between him and the defendant. The case was tried before a jury consisting of twelve jurors, nine of whom concurred in rendering a veridct in favor of the plaintiff, for the amount claimed in the complaint.' Judgment was entered there,on, and the defendant appealed. The only question raised is whether a judgment entered on a verdict concurred in by only nine jurors is valid. This question has been decided in the affirmative several times by this court, and we adhere to our former decisions in this class of cases, the first one of which is Hess v. White, 9 Utah 61.

The judgment is affirmed.

Zane, C. J., and Minee, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hess v. White
9 Utah 61 (Utah Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 P. 620, 13 Utah 31, 43 P.R. 620, 1896 Utah LEXIS 6, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pratt-v-parsons-utah-1896.