Pratt v. Gibson
This text of 171 P. 223 (Pratt v. Gibson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The appellant’s counsel assigns as errors alleged to have been committed by the trial court its action in overruling the demurrer, its refusal to instruct the jury as requested, and its giving of instructions to which exceptions were taken. None of these matters are properly before us for consideration, except the ruling upon the demurrer, for the objection that the complaint does not state fhcts sufficient to constitute a cause of action is never waived: Section 72, L. O. L. An examination of the averments of the complaint, as hereinbefore set forth, will show that the initiatory pleading is sufficient in all particulars. The judgment should therefore be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
Aeeirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 P. 223, 87 Or. 609, 1918 Ore. LEXIS 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pratt-v-gibson-or-1918.