Pratt v. Bidwell

56 N.E. 707, 175 Mass. 453, 1900 Mass. LEXIS 795
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 2, 1900·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Holmes, C. J.

This is a writ of error upon a judgment of the Superior Court in a writ of entry. The error alleged is that, by mistaken figures in a plan giving a measurement which the scale of the plan showed to be wrong, every one was misled at the trial and the defendant in error recovered a strip of land to which she was not entitled. In short, it is an attempt to re-try a case upon its merits by writ of error, on the ground that the time for review has gone by, and that otherwise the plaintiff in error will suffer wrong. A writ of error has no such function. “ A party cannot re-try his case upon error.” Raymond v. Butterworth, 139 Mass. 471. “ Error in fact cannot be assigned, where it contradicts the record, and where the matter of fact might have been put in issue and tried, and a fortiori, when it is in fact put in issue and tried.” Riley v. Waugh, 8 Cush. 220, 221. Bodurtha v. Goodrich, 3 Gray, 508, 512. Gray v. Cook, 135 Mass. 189, 190.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pratt v. Bidwell, 56 N.E. 707, 175 Mass. 453, 1900 Mass. LEXIS 795 (Mass. 1900).

56 N.E. 707 (Pratt v. Bidwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Aronson v. Commonwealth
121 N.E.2d 669 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1954)
MacEachern v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.
23 N.E.2d 1020 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1939)
Commercial Credit Corp. v. Flowers
185 N.E. 30 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Commonwealth v. Sacco
158 N.E. 167 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1927)