Pratt v. Bidwell
This text of 56 N.E. 707 (Pratt v. Bidwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a writ of error upon a judgment of the Superior Court in a writ of entry. The error alleged is that, by mistaken figures in a plan giving a measurement which the scale of the plan showed to be wrong, every one was misled at the trial and the defendant in error recovered a strip of land to which she was not entitled. In short, it is an attempt to re-try a case upon its merits by writ of error, on the ground that the time for review has gone by, and that otherwise the plaintiff in error will suffer wrong. A writ of error has no such function. “ A party cannot re-try his case upon error.” Raymond v. Butterworth, 139 Mass. 471. “ Error in fact cannot be assigned, where it contradicts the record, and where the matter of fact might have been put in issue and tried, and a fortiori, when it is in fact put in issue and tried.” Riley v. Waugh, 8 Cush. 220, 221. Bodurtha v. Goodrich, 3 Gray, 508, 512. Gray v. Cook, 135 Mass. 189, 190.
Writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
56 N.E. 707, 175 Mass. 453, 1900 Mass. LEXIS 795, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pratt-v-bidwell-mass-1900.