Pratt v. Babcock

10 Paige Ch. 295
New York Court of Chancery·Decided May 3, 1843·Published

Opinion

The Chancellor

said that where a defendant was a proper party, as one of the judgment debtors, at the time of the filing [296] of the bill, and had subsequently been discharged, it was a matter of course to permit the complainant to dismiss his bill as to sucb pai'ty, if the application was made within a reasonable time after the complainant had notice of the discharge under the bankrupt act; unless the defendant would stipulate to waive the benefit of his discharge.

Order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pratt v. Babcock, 10 Paige Ch. 295 (N.Y. 1843).

10 Paige Ch. 295 (Pratt v. Babcock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.