Pratt & Barker v. Bank of Windsor
1 Harr. Ch. 254
This text of 1 Harr. Ch. 254 (Pratt & Barker v. Bank of Windsor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pratt & Barker v. Bank of Windsor, 1 Harr. Ch. 254 (Mich. Ct. App. 1841).
Opinion
This motion must be granted on the authority of the case of Dunn vs. Dunn, 4 Paige, 425. The case is there fully considered, and Chancellor Walworth, after a full examination of all the authorities upon the subject, comes to the conclusion, that the.service of a subpoena out of the state, is irregular.
Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dunn v. Dunn
4 Paige Ch. 425 (New York Court of Chancery, 1834)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Harr. Ch. 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pratt-barker-v-bank-of-windsor-michchanct-1841.