Prater v. State

150 So. 124, 112 Fla. 239, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2205
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 5, 1933·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected; and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it s'eems. to the Court that *240 there is no error in the said judgment; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court that the said judgment of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Davis, C. J., and Brown, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prater v. State, 150 So. 124, 112 Fla. 239, 1933 Fla. LEXIS 2205 (Fla. 1933).

150 So. 124 (Prater v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.