Prater v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

866 So. 2d 212, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2141, 2004 WL 360862
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 2004·No. 3D03-1727·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

866 So.2d 212 (2004)

Linda M. PRATER, Appellant,
v.
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Appellee.

No. 3D03-1727.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

February 25, 2004.

*213 Linda M. Prater, in proper person.

Shapiro & Fishman, Deerfield Beach, and Susan Minor, for appellee.

Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and SHEPHERD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Linda M. Prater brings this appeal from an Order Ratifying Clerk's Sale and Directing Issuance of Certificate of Title and Denying Defendant's Objection to Sale. Although we are not unsympathetic to appellant's rendering of her factual plight, we nevertheless affirm. In order to vacate a foreclosure sale, the trial court must find (1) that the foreclosure sale bid was grossly or startlingly inadequate; and (2) that the inadequacy of the bid resulted from some mistake, fraud, or other irregularity in the sale. Mody v. California Fed. Bank, 747 So.2d 1016, 1017-18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (citing Arlt v. Buchanan, 190 So.2d 575, 577 (Fla.1966)). In this case, appellant is unable to meet these legal requirements. Accordingly, the order under review is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prater v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., 866 So. 2d 212, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2141, 2004 WL 360862 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

866 So. 2d 212 (Prater v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

First Union Realty Investment Corp. v. Gillis
894 So. 2d 305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
YEMC Construction & Development, Inc. v. Inter Ser, U.S.A., Inc.
884 So. 2d 446 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)