Prater v. McDonough

947 So. 2d 537, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21472, 2006 WL 3751504
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Prater v. McDonough. Read the opinion of the Court — 933 So. 2d 1222
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 2006·No. No. 1D05-5047·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse and remand the denial of Prater’s petition for writ of mandamus. Contrary to the trial court’s order, prisoners may petition to initiate rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act. See § 120.81(3), Fla. Stat. (2005) (explaining that prisoners may petition to initiate rule-making pursuant to section 120.54(7)). We do not, however, disturb the trial court’s sanctions order entered in a companion case. See Prater v. McDonough, No. 1D05-5027, 947 So.2d 538, 2006 WL 3751499 (Fla. 1st DCA Dec.22, 2006). Accordingly, all further action in this case shall proceed in accordance with that order by requiring Prater to either pay the filing fee or retain counsel.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

KAHN, HAWKES and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prater v. McDonough, 947 So. 2d 537, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21472, 2006 WL 3751504 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

947 So. 2d 537 (Prater v. McDonough) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prater v. McDonough
947 So. 2d 538 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)