Prater v. Britz

Missouri Court of Appeals

Prater v. Britz

553 S.W.3d 888

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 14, 2018

DocketWD 81130

StatusPublished

This text of 553 S.W.3d 888 (Prater v. Britz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prater v. Britz, 553 S.W.3d 888 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam:

*889Jimmy Prater appeals from the grant of summary judgment and of a motion to dismiss in favor of Sean Britz, Christina Britz, and Britz Wrecking, Inc. in a wrongful death action involving the death of Prater's father. Prater contends that the trial court erred in granting judgment in favor of the Respondents because there were genuine issues of material fact in dispute, and because the elements of collateral estoppel and judicial estoppel were not established. Prater also contends that the trial court erred in awarding costs to the Respondents.

Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam:

*889Jimmy Prater appeals from the grant of summary judgment and of a motion to dismiss in favor of Sean Britz, Christina Britz, and Britz Wrecking, Inc. in a wrongful death action involving the death of Prater's father. Prater contends that the trial court erred in granting judgment in favor of the Respondents because there were genuine issues of material fact in dispute, and because the elements of collateral estoppel and judicial estoppel were not established. Prater also contends that the trial court erred in awarding costs to the Respondents.

Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

553 S.W.3d 888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prater-v-britz-moctapp-2018.