Prateek Jain v. Sarika Samantha Wadhawan

Opinion

Opinion issued May 17, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). We dismiss any pending motions

as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Huddle.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-16-00043-CV ——————————— PRATEEK JAIN, Appellant V. SARIKA SAMANTHA WADHAWAN, Appellee On Appeal from the 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2015-22704 MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Prateek Jain, has neither established indigence, nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not adequately respond. See id. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of