Prateek Jain v. Sarika Samantha Wadhawan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Prateek Jain v. Sarika Samantha Wadhawan

DecidedMay 17, 2016

Docket01-16-00043-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Prateek Jain v. Sarika Samantha Wadhawan (Prateek Jain v. Sarika Samantha Wadhawan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prateek Jain v. Sarika Samantha Wadhawan, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion issued May 17, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-16-00043-CV ——————————— PRATEEK JAIN, Appellant V. SARIKA SAMANTHA WADHAWAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2015-22704

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Prateek Jain, has neither established indigence, nor paid, or made

arrangements to pay, the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP. P.

37.3(b). After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did

not adequately respond. See id. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b). We dismiss any pending motions

as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Massengale, and Huddle.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI