Prassert Paointhara v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
721 F.2d 651, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15241
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 16, 1983·No. 82-7236·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
ORDER
The petition for rehearing is denied. The opinion is amended as follows:
Delete from opinion dated June 15, 1983, commencing at page 2823, first column, line 4 of slip op., 708 F.2d 472 at page 474, second column, line 11, the following:
“Only by implication from the silences in this colloquy can it be inferred, if indeed it can be inferred at all, that petitioner, through his counsel, admitted his alienage. While we are aware of the need for dispatch in bringing deportation proceedings to a close, we *652 cannot accept inferences borne only by silence as substantial and probative evidence”
and insert in its stead:
“We hold that counsel’s statements were too ambiguous”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prassert Paointhara v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 721 F.2d 651, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15241 (9th Cir. 1983).
721 F.2d 651 (Prassert Paointhara v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mercado-Amador v. Reno
47 F. Supp. 2d 1219 (D. Oregon, 1999)
Momoh v. I.N.S.
989 F.2d 505 (Eighth Circuit, 1993)
Victor Gameros-Hernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
883 F.2d 839 (Ninth Circuit, 1989)
Antonio Hernandez-Robledo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
777 F.2d 536 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)
Abelardo Yatco Guinto v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
774 F.2d 991 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)