Prasla Property, Inc. Navroz K. Prasla, Media Films Craft, Inc., and Navrozmedianetwork, Inc. v. Spark Wealth Investment, LLC
This text of Prasla Property, Inc. Navroz K. Prasla, Media Films Craft, Inc., and Navrozmedianetwork, Inc. v. Spark Wealth Investment, LLC (Prasla Property, Inc. Navroz K. Prasla, Media Films Craft, Inc., and Navrozmedianetwork, Inc. v. Spark Wealth Investment, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued January 27, 2026
In The Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00920-CV ——————————— PRASLA PROPERTY, INC., NAVROZ K. PRASLA, MEDIA FILMS CRAFT, INC., AND NAVROZMEDIANETWORK, INC., Appellants V. SPARK WEALTH INVESTMENTS, LLC, Appellee
On Appeal from the 400th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 24-DCV-319828
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants Prasla Property, Inc., Navroz K. Prasla, Media Films Craft, Inc.,
and Navrozmedianetwork, Inc. filed their notice of appeal on November 3, 2025.
Appellants did not pay their appellate filing fee or establish indigence for purposes
of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5, 20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.851(b), 51.941(a); Order, Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil
Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District
Litigation, and in the Business Court, Misc. Docket No. 24-9047 (Tex. July 26,
2024), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1) (listing fees in courts of appeals).
The Clerk of this Court notified appellants that unless they paid the appellate filing
fee by December 29, 2025, their appeal could be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.3(b). To date, appellants have not responded to the Clerk’s notice, nor paid the
appellate filing fee or established indigence for purposes of appellate costs.
We dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b)–
(c), 43.2(f). We dismiss all pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Gunn and Johnson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Prasla Property, Inc. Navroz K. Prasla, Media Films Craft, Inc., and Navrozmedianetwork, Inc. v. Spark Wealth Investment, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prasla-property-inc-navroz-k-prasla-media-films-craft-inc-and-txctapp1-2026.