Prance v. State

702 So. 2d 627, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14569, 1997 WL 774569
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 1997·No. No. 96-3332·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s convictions are affirmed, but the civil judgments of restitution entered after the notice of appeal had divested the trial court of its jurisdiction are stricken. See, e.g., M.C.L. v. State, 682 So.2d 1209 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996); Nguyen v. State, 655 So.2d 1249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

MINER, ALLEN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prance v. State, 702 So. 2d 627, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 14569, 1997 WL 774569 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

702 So. 2d 627 (Prance v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brantley v. State
723 So. 2d 909 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Funchess v. State
705 So. 2d 713 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)