Pramco Ii, L.L.C. v. Cheyenne Water Service, Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, Virgin Islands
DecidedSeptember 10, 2018
Docket3:03-cv-00002
StatusUnknown

This text of Pramco Ii, L.L.C. v. Cheyenne Water Service, Inc. (Pramco Ii, L.L.C. v. Cheyenne Water Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, Virgin Islands primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pramco Ii, L.L.C. v. Cheyenne Water Service, Inc., (vid 2018).

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN

NORTHFIELD TRUST (ACM)†, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil No. 2003-02 CHEYENNE WATER SERVICE, INC., ) FLEAVIOEUS GREAVES, KEVIN ) GREAVES, EVELYN GREAVES, SHAMAR ) GREAVES, ISLAND BLOCK ) CORPORATION, and THE VIRGIN ) ISLANDS BUREAU OF INTERNAL ) REVENUE ) ) Defendants. ) )

APPEARANCES:

Richard H. Dollison, Esq. Law Offices of Richard H. Dollison PC St. Thomas, VI For the plaintiff, Northfield Trust (ACM),

Autumn S. Harrell, Esq. Law Offices of Andrew L. Capdeville, P.C. St. Thomas, VI For the defendant Shamar Greaves,

Kevin Greaves Pro se defendant,

Evelyn Greaves Pro se defendant,

Cheyenne Water Services, Inc. Unrepresented entity defendant,

James M. Derr, Esq. Law Offices of James M. Derr St. Thomas, VI For the defendant Island Block Corporation, Page 2

Claude Walker, Attorney General Tamika Archer, AAG Virgin Islands Department of Justice St. Thomas, VI For the defendant the Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue.

ORDER

GÓMEZ, J. Before the Court is the petition of Northfield Trust (ACM) for leave to execute on a July 27, 2004, judgment which was entered by the Court in this matter. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY This case was filed by Pramco II, L.L.C. (“Pramco”) on January 9, 2003. The complaint alleged that Fleavioeus Greaves, Evelyn Greaves, Kevin Greaves (collectively the “Greaves”), and Cheyenne Water Services, Inc. (“Cheyenne”) were in default on a note, and that the note was secured by a mortgage on real property in the Virgin Islands. On April 22, 2003, Fleavioeus Greaves appeared pro se and filed an answer. Cheyenne, Evelyn Greaves, and Kevin Greaves did not answer or appear. On June 16, 2003, Pramco moved for summary judgment. The Clerk entered default against Kevin Greaves, Evelyn Greaves, and Cheyenne on June 20, 2003. Thereafter, on July 27, 2004, the Court granted Pramco’s motion for summary judgment. The Court entered a judgment against the Greaves and Cheyenne in the amount of $215,032.52 Page 3

plus interest accruing at 4% thereafter, plus $2,500 in attorney’s fees and costs. The July 27, 2004, Judgment also foreclosed on Pramco’s liens against real property belonging to the Greaves and Cheyenne. That property was described in the Judgment as Parcel No. 19H Estate Mandahl, No. 1 Great Northside Quarter, St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands (the “Property”). The July 27, 2004, Judgment ordered that the Property be sold by the United States Marshal and the proceeds be applied toward satisfaction of the Judgment, including costs and attorney’s fees, and the costs of maintaining the Property. Subsequently, Pramco discovered that there were additional subordinate lienholders. On May 10, 2005, Pramco filed a motion to set aside the July 27, 2004, Judgment in order to be allowed to amend its complaint. On August 5, 2005, the Magistrate Judge purported to set aside the Judgment “solely for the purpose of allowing Pramco to amend its complaint and join the Island Block Corporation and the Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue in accordance with 28 V.I.C. § 522. No other aspect of the

[J]udgment [was] vacated.” Order, August 8, 2005, ECF No. 28. On March 3, 2007, Fleavioeus Greaves passed away. Thereafter, Pramco filed a suggestion of death. On September 17, 2007, Pramco filed a motion to substitute Fleavioeus Greaves’s Page 4

heirs--Shamar Greaves, Andrea Jaston, and Chayanna Greaves1--for Fleavioeus Greaves. Shamar Greaves filed a motion to dismiss. On August 1, 2008, the Court vacated the Magistrate’s August 5, 2005, Order because that order exceeded the Magistrate’s authority. The August 1, 2008, Order reinstated the July 27, 2004, Judgment. The Court also denied Pramco’s motion to set aside the Judgment and Pramco’s motion for substitution of parties. On February 19, 2013, Pramco assigned its interest in the July 27, 2004, Judgment to Northfield Trust (ACM) (“Northfield”). Thereafter, on September 4, 2013, Pramco filed a motion to substitute Northfield as the plaintiff in this matter. The Magistrate Judge granted Pramco’s motion to substitute on September 27, 2013. On September 13, 2013, Northfield filed a motion for leave to execute upon the July 27, 2004, Judgment. In an April 7, 2014, order, the Court denied Northfield’s motion for leave to execute. The Court found that Northfield had failed to serve all required parties pursuant to Title 5, Section 488 of the Virgin

Islands Code. On March 13, 2015, Northfield moved to effect service by publication. Northfield stated that it was unable to locate

1 Pramco also sought to substitute John Doe, representing any unknown heirs. Page 5

Andrea Jaston and Chayanna Greaves despite diligent efforts. The Magistrate Judge granted Northfield’s motion for leave to effect service by publication. In particular, the Magistrate ordered that “[s]ervice upon Andrea Jaston and Chayanna Greaves shall be made by publication in The Virgin Islands Daily News for not less than once a week for four consecutive weeks[.]” ECF No. 90 at 2. On May 1, 2018, Northfield filed proof that it had effected service on Andrea Jaston and Chayanna Greaves via publication in The Virgin Islands Daily News on February 24, 2018; March 3, 2018; March 10, 2018; and March 17, 2018. ` On August 10, 2018, in a filing entitled Notice of No Response to Corrected Service, Northfield states that the judgment debtors did not respond to Northfield’s attempt to effect service via publication in The Virgin Islands Daily News. Finally, Northfield petitioned the Court to allow it to execute on the July 27, 2004, Judgment. II. ANALYSIS “Under Rule 69(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

a federal court must follow relevant state law in a proceeding to execute on a judgment, unless a federal statute dictates otherwise.” Schreiber v. Kellogg, 50 F.3d 264, 267 (3d Cir. Page 6

1995).2 No federal statute governs the execution of local default and foreclosure judgments. As such, the Court looks at Virgin Islands law to determine whether Northfield may execute on the July 27, 2004, Judgment. A judgment in the Virgin Islands has a lifespan of twenty years, and thus it may be enforced within that time frame. See V.I. CODE ANN., tit. 5, § 31(1)(B); Creque v. Creque, 19 V.I. 408, 1983 WL 889868, *4 (Terr. Ct. 1983). Enforcement during that period is not entirely within the discretion of the judgment creditor. Indeed, “[t]itle 5, section 488 of the Virgin Islands Code (“Section 488”) requires that a judgment creditor seeking execution five or more years after entry of the judgment must obtain leave of the court by motion.” Chase Manhattan Bank N.A. v. Stapleton, Civ. No. 1993-29, 2008 WL 2995349, at *2 (D.V.I. July 31, 2008). That section outlines certain conditions that must be satisfied before the Court may grant leave to execute a judgment that is older than five years. In pertinent part, Section 488 provides: 1) The party in whose favor a judgment was given shall file a motion with the clerk of the court where the judgment was entered for leave to issue an execution. The motion shall state the names of the

2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a) provides: “A money judgment is enforced by a writ of execution, unless the court directs otherwise. The procedure on execution--and in proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment or execution--must accord with the procedure of the state where the court is located, but a federal statute governs to the extent it applies.” Fed. R. Civ. P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Palmer K. Schreiber v. Christopher G. Kellogg
50 F.3d 264 (Third Circuit, 1995)
Creque v. Creque
19 V.I. 408 (Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Pramco Ii, L.L.C. v. Cheyenne Water Service, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pramco-ii-llc-v-cheyenne-water-service-inc-vid-2018.