Prakash Poornan v. State
This text of Prakash Poornan v. State (Prakash Poornan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered June 8, 2018
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00354-CR
PRAKASH POORNAN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 7 Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 512034
ORDER Appellant’s brief was due May 3, 2018. When it was not filed, we notified appellant by
postcard dated May 7, 2018, and instructed him to file his brief and a motion to extend time to
file the brief by May 17, 2018. To date, no brief or motion has been filed, and we have had no
communication from appellant.
Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s
brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and
recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal or whether
appellant has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain
appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s
absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be
necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to Judge Genie Wright, Presiding
Judge, County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County; to retained counsel Paul Saputo; and to Jay
Brandon, Assistant District Attorney, Bexar County.
This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Prakash Poornan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prakash-poornan-v-state-tex-2018.