Prakash Poornan v. State

CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJune 8, 2018
Docket05-18-00354-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Prakash Poornan v. State (Prakash Poornan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prakash Poornan v. State, (Tex. 2018).

Opinion

Order entered June 8, 2018

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00354-CR

PRAKASH POORNAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No 7 Bexar County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 512034

ORDER Appellant’s brief was due May 3, 2018. When it was not filed, we notified appellant by

postcard dated May 7, 2018, and instructed him to file his brief and a motion to extend time to

file the brief by May 17, 2018. To date, no brief or motion has been filed, and we have had no

communication from appellant.

Therefore, we ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute this appeal or whether

appellant has abandoned the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain

appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s

absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be

necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this

order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order to Judge Genie Wright, Presiding

Judge, County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County; to retained counsel Paul Saputo; and to Jay

Brandon, Assistant District Attorney, Bexar County.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meza v. State
742 S.W.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Prakash Poornan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prakash-poornan-v-state-tex-2018.