Praisner v. State

208 A.3d 1239, 332 Conn. 905
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 12, 2019
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 208 A.3d 1239 (Praisner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Praisner v. State, 208 A.3d 1239, 332 Conn. 905 (Colo. 2019).

Opinion

D'AURIA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 189 Conn. App. 540, 208 A.3d 667 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly hold that a university police officer is not a member of a 'local police department' entitled to indemnification under General Statutes § 53-39a ?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Praisner v. State
336 Conn. 420 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2020)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 A.3d 1239, 332 Conn. 905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/praisner-v-state-conn-2019.