Praisner v. State

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Praisner v. State

208 A.3d 1239, 332 Conn. 905

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 12, 2019·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

D'AURIA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 189 Conn. App. 540, 208 A.3d 667 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly hold that a university police officer is not a member of a 'local police department' entitled to indemnification under General Statutes § 53-39a ?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

D'AURIA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 189 Conn. App. 540, 208 A.3d 667 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly hold that a university police officer is not a member of a 'local police department' entitled to indemnification under General Statutes § 53-39a ?"

Praisner v. State, 208 A.3d 1239, 332 Conn. 905 (Colo. 2019).

Pincite

208 A.3d 1239 (Praisner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related