Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Hyde

1932 OK 478, 12 P.2d 503, 158 Okla. 55, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 918
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided June 21, 1932·No. 22300·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ANDREWS, J.

This is an original proceeding instituted by the respondent before the State Industrial Commission to review an award in favor of the claimant therein. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as petitioner and claimant, respectively.

There is competent evidence in the record reasonably tending to support the finding of the State Industrial Commission that the cláimant received an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with the petitioner, which resulted in a 70 per cent, permanent partial disability to the hand of the claimant. The claimant testified as to the injury and there was medical testimony as to the extent and duration of the disability.

In accordance with the statute applicable thereto, the petition to vacate the award is denied.

RILEY, HEFNER, OULLISON, SWIN-DALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. LESTER, C. J., and CLARK, Y. C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Hyde, 1932 OK 478, 12 P.2d 503, 158 Okla. 55, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 918 (Okla. 1932).

1932 OK 478 (Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Hyde) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Ardmore v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.
1935 OK 558 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)