Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Hyde

1932 OK 478, 12 P.2d 503, 158 Okla. 55, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 918
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJune 21, 1932
Docket22300
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1932 OK 478 (Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Hyde) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Hyde, 1932 OK 478, 12 P.2d 503, 158 Okla. 55, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 918 (Okla. 1932).

Opinion

ANDREWS, J.

This is an original proceeding instituted by the respondent before the State Industrial Commission to review an award in favor of the claimant therein. The parties hereinafter will be referred to as petitioner and claimant, respectively.

There is competent evidence in the record reasonably tending to support the finding of the State Industrial Commission that the cláimant received an accidental personal injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with the petitioner, which resulted in a 70 per cent, permanent partial disability to the hand of the claimant. The claimant testified as to the injury and there was medical testimony as to the extent and duration of the disability.

In accordance with the statute applicable thereto, the petition to vacate the award is denied.

RILEY, HEFNER, OULLISON, SWIN-DALL, McNEILL, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. LESTER, C. J., and CLARK, Y. C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Ardmore v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. Co.
1935 OK 558 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1932 OK 478, 12 P.2d 503, 158 Okla. 55, 1932 Okla. LEXIS 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prairie-pipe-line-co-v-hyde-okla-1932.