Prairie Life Insurance v. Schumann
This text of 177 N.W. 168 (Prairie Life Insurance v. Schumann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As shown by the record, but not as indicated in appellant’s brief, this is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment sustaining defendant Schumann’s spiecial appearance and dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. In the absence of evidence, we must presume that the trial court’s findings of fact, sustaining the special appearance, were true. The special appearance itself being ample, if true, to show that the court did not obtain jurisdiction of the person and subject-matter of the action, it follows that the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed. Cady Lumber Co. v. Reed, 90 Neb. 293.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 N.W. 168, 104 Neb. 363, 1920 Neb. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prairie-life-insurance-v-schumann-neb-1920.