Prager v. McAdam
161 A.2d 39, 399 Pa. 405, 1960 Pa. LEXIS 466
Opinion
Opinion
The decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed at the appellant’s costs on the opinion of President Judge Shumaker sustaining the defendant’s preliminary objections to the complaint which shows on its face the insufficiency of the writing relied upon.
Decree affirmed at appellant’s costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prager v. McAdam, 161 A.2d 39, 399 Pa. 405, 1960 Pa. LEXIS 466 (Pa. 1960).
161 A.2d 39 (Prager v. McAdam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re: Condemnation of Premises Owned by R.E. Powell, II ~ Appeal of R.E. Powell, II
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 2021
Huston, M. v. Summerhill, A.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2014
Turner v. Hostetler
518 A.2d 833 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1986)
Grieber v. Scott
461 A.2d 619 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1983)
Yinger v. Springer
305 A.2d 19 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1973)
Palmeri v. Diomedo
59 Pa. D. & C.2d 664 (Northampton County Court of Common Pleas, 1972)
Goodheart v. Gordon
52 Pa. D. & C.2d 531 (Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, 1971)
Pierro v. Pierro
264 A.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Beeruk Estate
241 A.2d 755 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Klipfel v. Brandenburger
156 N.W.2d 774 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1968)
Brown v. Hahn
213 A.2d 342 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
Pillsbury v. McNabb
37 Pa. D. & C.2d 283 (Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas, 1965)
Williams v. Stewart
168 A.2d 769 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1961)