Prager v. MARKS BROTHERS COMPANY
This text of 483 So. 2d 881 (Prager v. MARKS BROTHERS COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Elsie PRAGER, Appellant,
v.
MARKS BROTHERS COMPANY, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward Perse, Miami, Stephen Nelson, for appellant.
Ponzoli & Wassenberg and Steven B. Sundook, Miami, for appellee.
Before HENDRY, HUBBART and FERGUSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
The final summary judgment under review is affirmed, as it appears without genuine material dispute that the defendant herein committed no act of negligence in this case. The plaintiff herein slipped on some dirt as she was walking in a large curbside flowerbox which was being constructed by the defendant on Miracle Mile in Coral Gables, Florida. The record affirmatively demonstrates that the unfinished flowerbox did not represent, in any sense, a dangerous condition for which a warning, as urged, was necessary. This being so, summary judgment was properly entered below for the defendant. See Clark v. Lumbermans Mutual Insurance Co., 465 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Cassel v. Price, 396 So.2d 258 (Fla. 1st DCA), pet. for review denied, 407 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 1981).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
483 So. 2d 881, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 556, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prager-v-marks-brothers-company-fladistctapp-1986.