Pragay v. Lavado

45 A.D.3d 828, 845 N.Y.S.2d 751
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 27, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Lefkowitz, J.), dated March 19, 2007, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Pursuant to Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1211 (a), a “driver of a vehicle shall not back the same unless such movement can be made with safety and without interfering with other traffic.” Here, the plaintiff established her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that she was standing in a crosswalk waiting to cross the street when the defendant, who had been sitting in his parked vehicle, suddenly backed his car and struck her. In opposition to the plaintiffs motion, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability (see Ortiz v Calavera, 26 AD3d 319 [2006]; Garcia v Verizon N.Y., Inc., 10 AD3d 339 [2004]; Pressner v Serrano, 260 AD2d 458 [1999]). Schmidt, J.P., Spolzino, Skelos, Lifson and McCarthy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pragay v. Lavado, 45 A.D.3d 828, 845 N.Y.S.2d 751 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

45 A.D.3d 828 (Pragay v. Lavado) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logan v. Apex Express, Inc.
2018 NY Slip Op 6892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)