Prag v. Pfaff

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Prag v. Pfaff

1 Balt. C. Rep. 428

DecidedFebruary 13, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Balt. C. Rep. 428 (Prag v. Pfaff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prag v. Pfaff, 1 Balt. C. Rep. 428 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PHELPS, J.

The deed of trust for the benefit of creditors referred to in the proceedings, made at the time, by the party and under the circumstances therein stated and admitted, is within the meaning of Section 24 of Article 47 of the Maryland Code, and the burden of proof resting upon the parties thereto to explain the same and show the bona fides thereof, not having been discharged as required by law, said deed is held to be fraudulent in law and void, and the making thereof an act in insolvency.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PHELPS, J.

The deed of trust for the benefit of creditors referred to in the proceedings, made at the time, by the party and under the circumstances therein stated and admitted, is within the meaning of Section 24 of Article 47 of the Maryland Code, and the burden of proof resting upon the parties thereto to explain the same and show the bona fides thereof, not having been discharged as required by law, said deed is held to be fraudulent in law and void, and the making thereof an act in insolvency.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Balt. C. Rep. 428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prag-v-pfaff-pactcompl-1894.