Prado v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Prado v. State

755 So. 2d 178, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4157, 2000 WL 353945

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 2000·No. No. 2D98-503·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Valentine C. Prado appeals the trial court’s denial of his dispositive motion to suppress and his sentence under the 1995 sentencing guidelines. This appeal was stayed pending the supreme court’s ruling in Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb. [179]*17917, 2000). However, on January 9, 2000, Mr. Prado completed his prison sentence and was released. The sentencing issue is thus moot. We affirm without further discussion the denial of Mr. Prado’s motion to suppress.

Affirmed.

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Valentine C. Prado appeals the trial court’s denial of his dispositive motion to suppress and his sentence under the 1995 sentencing guidelines. This appeal was stayed pending the supreme court’s ruling in Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb. [179]*17917, 2000). However, on January 9, 2000, Mr. Prado completed his prison sentence and was released. The sentencing issue is thus moot. We affirm without further discussion the denial of Mr. Prado’s motion to suppress.

Affirmed.

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Prado v. State, 755 So. 2d 178, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4157, 2000 WL 353945 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

755 So. 2d 178 (Prado v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related