Prado v. State
This text of 755 So. 2d 178 (Prado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Valentine C. Prado appeals the trial court’s denial of his dispositive motion to suppress and his sentence under the 1995 sentencing guidelines. This appeal was stayed pending the supreme court’s ruling in Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 178052 (Fla. Feb. [179]*17917, 2000). However, on January 9, 2000, Mr. Prado completed his prison sentence and was released. The sentencing issue is thus moot. We affirm without further discussion the denial of Mr. Prado’s motion to suppress.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
755 So. 2d 178, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4157, 2000 WL 353945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prado-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.