Prado v. Hydrocarbon Testers, Inc.

332 So. 2d 514, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4832
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided May 26, 1976·No. No. 5466·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PETERS, Judge ad hoc.

Defendant-appellant neither appeared nor filed brief prior to the time this case was called for argument. Therefore, the court considers this appeal abandoned and dismisses it at defendant-appellant’s cost. Rule 7, Section 5(b), Uniform Rules, Courts of Appeal.

Plaintiff-appellee filed a brief praying that the court amend the lower court judgment to increase the award made in favor of plaintiff. Plaintiff-appellee filed no formal answer to defendant’s appeal and the court therefore cannot consider her claims. LSA-C.C.P. 2133.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prado v. Hydrocarbon Testers, Inc., 332 So. 2d 514, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4832 (La. Ct. App. 1976).

332 So. 2d 514 (Prado v. Hydrocarbon Testers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dixon v. Houck
466 So. 2d 57 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1985)
Pasqua v. LaFourche Parish School Bd.
408 So. 2d 438 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1981)