Pradel v. Pradel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Pradel v. Pradel

1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 62

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJuly 1, 1880

DocketNo. 6459

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 62 (Pradel v. Pradel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pradel v. Pradel, 1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 62 (La. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

Marr, J.

Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal, because of the insufficiency of the surety on the appeal bond.

The proof shows that the surety is wholly irresponsible.

The appellant has filed in this court receipts for costs of this court and the court below paid by her. The motion to dismiss must be decided by the condition of things existing at the time it is made.

We cannot hear evidence as to the sufficiency of the surety; that must be shown by evidence taken in the court below.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Marr, J.

Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal, because of the insufficiency of the surety on the appeal bond.

The proof shows that the surety is wholly irresponsible.

The appellant has filed in this court receipts for costs of this court and the court below paid by her. The motion to dismiss must be decided by the condition of things existing at the time it is made.

We cannot hear evidence as to the sufficiency of the surety; that must be shown by evidence taken in the court below.

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Mann. Unrep. Cas. 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pradel-v-pradel-la-1880.