Prada v. ADMINISTRATOR, SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
This text of 432 S.E.2d 274 (Prada v. ADMINISTRATOR, SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a dispossessory action in which a Writ of Possession was ordered on behalf of appellee, Administrator, Small Business Administration (SBA), against appellant, Humberto Prada. The SBA obtained a dispossessory warrant on June 29, 1992, and a trial was held, without a jury, on July 22, 1992 in the State Court of DeKalb County. Prada, appealing pro se, asserts several enumerations of error all raising general grounds. “However, no transcript of the proceeding is present in the record before us. ‘Where no transcript of evidence is filed all grounds requiring a consideration of evidence must be affirmed. [Cit.]’ [Cit.]” Southerland v. Oxford Group, 162 Ga. App. 213 (290 SE2d 556) (1982). See also P. H. L. Dev. Corp. v. Smith, 174 Ga. App. 328 (329 SE2d 545) (1985).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
432 S.E.2d 274, 208 Ga. App. 710, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1969, 1993 Ga. App. LEXIS 572, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prada-v-administrator-small-business-administration-gactapp-1993.