Practice Management Associates, Inc. v. Price
This text of 632 So. 2d 709 (Practice Management Associates, Inc. v. Price) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this appeal, Practice Management Associates, Inc. (PMA) challenges the final summary judgment for Dr. Charles Patterson, an Illinois chiropractor. PMA argues that the trial court improperly found that the contract between PMA and Dr. Price required illegal fee-splitting under Illinois law.
We agree with PMA that the contract does not require illegal fee splitting and reverse on the authority of Practice Management Associates, Inc. v. Orman, 614 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
632 So. 2d 709, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1816, 1994 WL 66877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/practice-management-associates-inc-v-price-fladistctapp-1994.