Practice Management Associates, Inc. v. Price

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Practice Management Associates, Inc. v. Price

632 So. 2d 709, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1816, 1994 WL 66877

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 2, 1994·No. No. 93-00159·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, Practice Management Associates, Inc. (PMA) challenges the final summary judgment for Dr. Charles Patterson, an Illinois chiropractor. PMA argues that the trial court improperly found that the contract between PMA and Dr. Price required illegal fee-splitting under Illinois law.

We agree with PMA that the contract does not require illegal fee splitting and reverse on the authority of Practice Management Associates, Inc. v. Orman, 614 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FULMER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal, Practice Management Associates, Inc. (PMA) challenges the final summary judgment for Dr. Charles Patterson, an Illinois chiropractor. PMA argues that the trial court improperly found that the contract between PMA and Dr. Price required illegal fee-splitting under Illinois law.

We agree with PMA that the contract does not require illegal fee splitting and reverse on the authority of Practice Management Associates, Inc. v. Orman, 614 So.2d 1135 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FULMER and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Practice Management Associates, Inc. v. Price, 632 So. 2d 709, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 1816, 1994 WL 66877 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

632 So. 2d 709 (Practice Management Associates, Inc. v. Price) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related