PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

D.C. Circuit

PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

51 F. App'x 322

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 26, 2002

DocketNos. 01-1369, 01-1370

StatusPublished

This text of 51 F. App'x 322 (PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

PPL Electric Utilities Corp. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 51 F. App'x 322 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause was considered on the record compiled before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. The court is satisfied that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petitions for review be DENIED for the reasons stated in the Commission’s orders in PJM Interconnection, LLC, 95 FERC If 61,175 (2001), and PJM Interconnection, LLC, 95 FERC If 61,330 (2001). The Commission acted within its discretion in allowing the amendments to the PJM.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This cause was considered on the record compiled before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and on the briefs and arguments of the parties. The court is satisfied that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petitions for review be DENIED for the reasons stated in the Commission’s orders in PJM Interconnection, LLC, 95 FERC If 61,175 (2001), and PJM Interconnection, LLC, 95 FERC If 61,330 (2001). The Commission acted within its discretion in allowing the amendments to the PJM.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 F. App'x 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ppl-electric-utilities-corp-v-federal-energy-regulatory-commission-cadc-2002.