Pozo v. Prada
442 So. 2d 261, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24241
Opinion
We reverse the award of prejudgment interest which was incorrectly awarded on unliquidated damages. McCoy v. Rudd, 367 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Appellant’s other issues are without merit. Spencer v. American Advisory Corp., 338 So.2d 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 953 (Fla.1977); Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc., 212 So.2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968); see Bannister v. Hart, 144 So.2d 853 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962); Seiferth v. Seiferth, 121 So.2d 689 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pozo v. Prada, 442 So. 2d 261, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24241 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
442 So. 2d 261 (Pozo v. Prada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Spencer v. American Advisory Corp.
338 So. 2d 62 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc.
212 So. 2d 906 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1968)
Seiferth v. Seiferth
121 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
McCoy v. Rudd
367 So. 2d 1080 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Bannister v. Hart
144 So. 2d 853 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)