Pozo v. Prada

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pozo v. Prada

442 So. 2d 261, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24241

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 15, 1983

DocketNos. 83-547, 83-1359

StatusPublished

This text of 442 So. 2d 261 (Pozo v. Prada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pozo v. Prada, 442 So. 2d 261, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24241 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the award of prejudgment interest which was incorrectly awarded on unliquidated damages. McCoy v. Rudd, 367 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Appellant’s other issues are without merit. Spencer v. American Advisory Corp., 338 So.2d 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 953 (Fla.1977); Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc., 212 So.2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968); see Bannister v. Hart, 144 So.2d 853 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962); Seiferth v. Seiferth, 121 So.2d 689 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the award of prejudgment interest which was incorrectly awarded on unliquidated damages. McCoy v. Rudd, 367 So.2d 1080 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). Appellant’s other issues are without merit. Spencer v. American Advisory Corp., 338 So.2d 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), cert. denied, 348 So.2d 953 (Fla.1977); Vokes v. Arthur Murray, Inc., 212 So.2d 906 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968); see Bannister v. Hart, 144 So.2d 853 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962); Seiferth v. Seiferth, 121 So.2d 689 (Fla. 3d DCA 1960).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

442 So. 2d 261, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 24241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pozo-v-prada-fladistctapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack