Pozo v. Connor

107 La. 453
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedNovember 15, 1901
DocketNo. 13,964
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 107 La. 453 (Pozo v. Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pozo v. Connor, 107 La. 453 (La. 1901).

Opinion

Statement of the Case.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nicholls, C. J.

The plaintiff, by direct action, and the defendant, in reconvention, each prayed, in the District Court, for a separation from bed and board from the other. The court rejected both demands and the plaintiff appealed.

The judgment appealed from was correct. The court could have reached no other conclusion under the evidence. The parties have, neither of them, acted in such a manner as to justify a judicial separation, and theTe has been nothing in the conduct of either which would or should prevent, after calm reflection and consideration rof the duty which husbands and wives not only owe to each other, but to their young children, the reunion of these parties. The law intentionally leaves open a ,way for reconciliation even after a judicial separation.

Decrees of separation and divorce are granted with reluctance.

Eor the reasons assigned, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed, with costs.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Graff v. Graff
67 So. 817 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)
Conner v. Pozo
38 So. 454 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 La. 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pozo-v-connor-la-1901.