Poznanski v. Szczech
This text of 71 Ill. App. 670 (Poznanski v. Szczech) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the Court.
. "From various cases cited by the appellant we- infer that for failure by an appellee—as in this case—to file briefs, the Appellate Courts in some of the other districts will sometimes reverse judgments. This, however, is done under rules, and this court has no such rule.
' There is no doubt of the exact ciscumstances under which the appellant sustained injuries for which he sued the appellee. They were both carpenters, and the appellant worked for the appellee. The appellee built a scaffold alongside of a house, the supports of the scaffold not being braced outside of the house. The appellant was at work upon it and it fell with the weight of lumber piled, and of another workman climbing upon it.
The fact that the scaffold was not braced was as obvious •to the appellant as to the appellee, and both being carpenters, they were presumptively equally capable of judging as to the sufficiency of it.
The appellant makes no complaint of the instructions, and the verdict was right upon the facts. By a succession of misfortunes the appellant was prevented from attending at the trial, and if his testimony could have put any different face upon the facts, a new trial should have been granted. It is not claimed that his testimony could have had such effect.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 Ill. App. 670, 1897 Ill. App. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poznanski-v-szczech-illappct-1897.