Poyzer v. Beardsley

Colorado Court of Appeals

Poyzer v. Beardsley

25 Colo. App. 134

CourtColorado Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 15, 1913

DocketNo. 3694

StatusPublished

This text of 25 Colo. App. 134 (Poyzer v. Beardsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poyzer v. Beardsley, 25 Colo. App. 134 (Colo. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

King, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action commenced by appellee to quiet his title. All matters involved herein have been so frequently decided by the supreme court and by this court adversely to the contention of the appellant, that a written opinion giving reasons ‘for the conclusion reached would serve no useful purpose, and is therefore dispensed with. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action commenced by appellee to quiet his title. All matters involved herein have been so frequently decided by the supreme court and by this court adversely to the contention of the appellant, that a written opinion giving reasons ‘for the conclusion reached would serve no useful purpose, and is therefore dispensed with. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 Colo. App. 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poyzer-v-beardsley-coloctapp-1913.