Poyzer v. Beardsley

Colorado Court of Appeals

Poyzer v. Beardsley

25 Colo. App. 134

Colorado Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 1913·No. No. 3694·Published

Opinion

King, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action commenced by appellee to quiet his title. All matters involved herein have been so frequently decided by the supreme court and by this court adversely to the contention of the appellant, that a written opinion giving reasons ‘for the conclusion reached would serve no useful purpose, and is therefore dispensed with. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action commenced by appellee to quiet his title. All matters involved herein have been so frequently decided by the supreme court and by this court adversely to the contention of the appellant, that a written opinion giving reasons ‘for the conclusion reached would serve no useful purpose, and is therefore dispensed with. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Poyzer v. Beardsley, 25 Colo. App. 134 (Colo. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

25 Colo. App. 134 (Poyzer v. Beardsley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.