Poythress v. State

56 So. 168, 99 Miss. 805
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1911
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 56 So. 168 (Poythress v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poythress v. State, 56 So. 168, 99 Miss. 805 (Mich. 1911).

Opinion

Whitfield. C.

The eighth, ninth, and tenth grounds of demurrer to the indictment in this case were well taken. It was essential that the indictment should have averred that the cancellation of the deed of trust by marginal entry on the record was attested by the chancery clerk as required by law, and it was essential that this should have been proven. " The attestation of the clerk was neeessary to give cancellation legal efficacy or validity. France v. State, 83 Miss. 281, 35 South. 313; Robinson v. State, 35 Tex. Cr. R. 54, 43 S. W. 526, 60 Am. St. Rep. 20; Sutton v. State, 58 Neb. 567, 79 N. W. 154; Overly v. State, 34 Tex. Cr. R. 500, 31 S. W. 377.

. We notice no other assignment of errof. Reversed.

Per Curiam.

The above opinion is adopted as the opinion of the court, and for the reasons therein indicated the judgment of the court overruling the demurrer [812]*812to the indictment is reversed, the demurrer sustained, the indictment quashed, and the prisoner will he held to answer such further indictment as the grand jury may present against him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duss v. Duss
111 So. 382 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 So. 168, 99 Miss. 805, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poythress-v-state-miss-1911.