Poyner v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Poyner v. Smith

693 So. 2d 636, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4326, 1997 WL 186290

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 18, 1997

DocketNo. 96-2779

StatusPublished

This text of 693 So. 2d 636 (Poyner v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Poyner v. Smith, 693 So. 2d 636, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4326, 1997 WL 186290 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the lower court erred in not making the ordered child support reduction retroactive to the date of filing the petition. See McGee-Manis v. Manis, 657 So.2d 78 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), Witcher v. Petty, 534 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). However, we have no sufficient basis to reverse the amount of reduction determined by the lower court and otherwise affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

COBB, W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the lower court erred in not making the ordered child support reduction retroactive to the date of filing the petition. See McGee-Manis v. Manis, 657 So.2d 78 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), Witcher v. Petty, 534 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). However, we have no sufficient basis to reverse the amount of reduction determined by the lower court and otherwise affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

COBB, W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

693 So. 2d 636, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4326, 1997 WL 186290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poyner-v-smith-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack