Poyner v. Smith

693 So. 2d 636, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4326, 1997 WL 186290
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 18, 1997·No. No. 96-2779·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We agree with appellant that the lower court erred in not making the ordered child support reduction retroactive to the date of filing the petition. See McGee-Manis v. Manis, 657 So.2d 78 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995), Witcher v. Petty, 534 So.2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). However, we have no sufficient basis to reverse the amount of reduction determined by the lower court and otherwise affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

COBB, W. SHARP and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Poyner v. Smith, 693 So. 2d 636, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4326, 1997 WL 186290 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

693 So. 2d 636 (Poyner v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Witcher v. Petty
534 So. 2d 1240 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
McGee-Manis v. Manis
657 So. 2d 78 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)