Powhatan Coal & Coke Co. v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.

178 F. 266, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4502, 101 Cal. 626
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 1910
DocketNo. 917
StatusPublished

This text of 178 F. 266 (Powhatan Coal & Coke Co. v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Powhatan Coal & Coke Co. v. Norfolk & W. Ry. Co., 178 F. 266, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4502, 101 Cal. 626 (4th Cir. 1910).

Opinion

PER C'URIAH.

This court, on a former day of this session, in the case of the Columbus Iron & Steel Company v. Kanawha & Michigan Railway Company, 178 Fed. 261. filed an opinion affirming the decree appealed from in that case, which in effect disposes of the controversy herein involved. On the case made by the bill, the court below, at the time it was filed, was without jurisdiction of the subject-matter, and therefore the decree dismissing it is without error. Abilene Cotton Oil Co. Case, 204 U. S. 426, 27 Sup. Ct. 350, 51 L. Ed. 553. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company et al. v. United States ex rel. Pitcairn Coal Company, 215 U. S. 481, 30 Sup. Ct. 164. 54 L. Ed.-, and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Illinois Central Railroad Co., 215 U. S. 452, 30 Sup. Ct. 155, 54 L. Ed.-, both of which cases were decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on the 10th da;- of January, 1910, clearly' indicate our duty in the appeal now to be disposed of.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
178 F. 266, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 4502, 101 Cal. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powhatan-coal-coke-co-v-norfolk-w-ry-co-ca4-1910.