Powers v. Vecchio
This text of 189 A.2d 637 (Powers v. Vecchio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The controversy in this case centers on a claim for commissions on the sale of real estate by the appellants to the appellees, for which the appellants were held liable on the strength of a verbal promise to pay. They now contend that the court erred in admitting testimony to vary the terms of the written contract. The short answer is that the evidence came in without objection or without any ruling by the court on this point, or was brought out by the appellants themselves. Cf. State Roads Comm. v. Bare, 220 Md. 91, 94 and Todd v. Ferrell, 212 Md. 574, 580.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 A.2d 637, 231 Md. 238, 1963 Md. LEXIS 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powers-v-vecchio-md-1963.