Powers v. Theofel

226 A.D. 696
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 226 A.D. 696 (Powers v. Theofel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Powers v. Theofel, 226 A.D. 696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Order reversed upon the law, witn ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. In our opinion the action may be maintained. (Brown v. Cole, 54 Misc. 278; Cummings v. Bailey, 53 id. 142; affd., 120 App. Div. 892.) The record shows that the amended rules of the Democratic county committee of Queens county were not adopted by a majority of that committee as required by section 15 of the Election Law. They are, therefore, invalid and their enforcement may be enjoined. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

De Camilla v. Connery
43 Misc. 2d 395 (New York County Courts, 1964)
Theofel v. Butler
134 Misc. 259 (New York Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 A.D. 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powers-v-theofel-nyappdiv-1929.