Powers v. Standard Oil Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Powers v. Standard Oil Co.

258 N.W. 134, 63 S.D. 297, 1934 S.D. LEXIS 145

CourtSouth Dakota Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 29, 1934

DocketFile No. 7660.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 258 N.W. 134 (Powers v. Standard Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering South Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Powers v. Standard Oil Co., 258 N.W. 134, 63 S.D. 297, 1934 S.D. LEXIS 145 (S.D. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

This court dismissed an appeal as to one A.G. Powers for the reason that he had died subsequent to the entry of judgment in the case and prior to the taking of the appeal. Powers et al v. Standard Oil Co., 62 S.D. 33, 251 N.W. 187. The administrators of the estate of A.G. Powers, deceased, then applied to the circuit court of Butte county for an order substituting them as parties to the action, and the court granted the application. This is an attempted appeal by such administrators. In an original proceeding in certiorari instituted by the respondent to review the order of substitution, this court held that the circuit court was without jurisdiction to enter such order. Standard Oil Co. v. McNenny, 62 S.D. 277, 252 N.W. 841.

The purported appeal therefore, from the judgment and order denying motion for new trial is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This court dismissed an appeal as to one A.G. Powers for the reason that he had died subsequent to the entry of judgment in the case and prior to the taking of the appeal. Powers et al v. Standard Oil Co., 62 S.D. 33, 251 N.W. 187. The administrators of the estate of A.G. Powers, deceased, then applied to the circuit court of Butte county for an order substituting them as parties to the action, and the court granted the application. This is an attempted appeal by such administrators. In an original proceeding in certiorari instituted by the respondent to review the order of substitution, this court held that the circuit court was without jurisdiction to enter such order. Standard Oil Co. v. McNenny, 62 S.D. 277, 252 N.W. 841.

The purported appeal therefore, from the judgment and order denying motion for new trial is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 N.W. 134, 63 S.D. 297, 1934 S.D. LEXIS 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powers-v-standard-oil-co-sd-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack