Powers v. Spinner
This text of 202 N.E.2d 246 (Powers v. Spinner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order sustaining demurrer affirmed. A school teacher brings this action of contract against five defendants, constituting a majority of the members of the school committee of Westford, to recover increases of salary voted by the school committee for the year 1963. The defendants later voted to “eliminate” from the school committee budget the funds necessary to pay the salary increases. A demurrer was properly sustained. The town, rather than the school committee or its individual members, would be liable for duly earned teachers’ salaries which have been finally established by [770]*770the school committee by a vote not rescinded. See Callahan v. Woburn, 306 Mass. 265, 273; Lynch v. Fall River, 336 Mass. 558, 559. See also G. L. c. 71, § 38 (as amended through St. 1960, c. 333, § 2); McQuillin, Municipal Corporations (3d ed.) § 12.214. We need not now consider what power the school committee possesses to rescind previously voted salary increases. See G. L. c. 71, § 43 (later amended by St. 1963, c. 466, § 4). Cf. McDevitt v. School Comm. of Malden, 298 Mass. 213, 214—215; Watt v. Chelmsford, 328 Mass. 430, 433; Murphy v. Cambridge, 342 Mass. 339, 340-342. Cf. also O’Brien v. Pittsfield, 316 Mass. 283, 286.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 N.E.2d 246, 348 Mass. 769, 1964 Mass. LEXIS 963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powers-v-spinner-mass-1964.