Powers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided August 15, 2017·No. 15-1096·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: July 20, 2017

* * * * * * * * * * * * * DONNA SCAMBY POWERS, * * UNPUBLISHED Petitioner, * * Special Master Gowen v. * No. 15-1096V * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Proffer; Not Contesting Entitlement; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Guillain-Barré * Syndrome (GBS) Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol Weiss, Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner. Linda Sara Renzi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON PROFFER1

Gowen, Special Master:

On September 30, 2015, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered from Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) as a result of an influenza vaccine administered on October 10, 2012. Petition at 1.

On June 29, 2017, respondent filed a status report along with his Rule 4(c) Report in which he states that he does not contest that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Status Report at 1. On July 13, 2017, a ruling on entitlement was issued, finding petitioner entitled to compensation for GBS. Counsel for the parties have worked diligently with their experts and have come to a resolution of damages. Their respective life care planners have

1 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012). The court’s website is at http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. Before the decision is posted on the court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). “An objecting party must provide the court with a proposed redacted version of the decision.” Id. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the decision will be posted on the court’s website. Id. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). agreed on future care issues and costs. The parties have submitted a projection of future lost wages, which has been reduced to present value and to which they have agreed. On July 14, 2017, respondent filed a proffer on award of compensation (“Proffer”) indicating petitioner should be awarded $841,728.00. Proffer at 5. In the Proffer, respondent represented that petitioner agrees with the proffered award. I have reviewed the proffer and do award damages in accord with it. The Proffer is incorporated herein and made a part hereof as Appendix A. Based on the record as a whole, I find that petitioner is entitled to an award as stated in the Proffer.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner the following in compensation:

1) A lump sum payment of $841,728.00, representing compensation for lost past and future earnings ($618,595.00), pain and suffering ($173,968.00), and life care expenses for Year One ($49,165.00), in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Donna Scamby Powers.3

2) An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract as described in Section II. B of the Proffer attached herein as Appendix A, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased.

The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master

3 This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under § 300aa-15(a). 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 Case 1:15-vv-01096-UNJ Document 36 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 5

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL MASTERS ____________________________________ DONNA SCAMBY POWERS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 15-1096V v. ) Special Master Thomas L. Gowen ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent, )

RESPONDENT’S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION

Respondent submits the following recommendations regarding items of compensation to

be awarded to petitioner under the Vaccine Act.

I. Items of Compensation

A. Life Care Items

Respondent engaged life care planner Linda Curtis, RN, MSN, CCM, CNCLP, and

petitioner engaged Roberta Hurley, Hurley and Econs Consulting, to provide an estimation of

Donna Scamby Powers’s (“petitioner”) future vaccine-injury related needs. The parties’

planners came to a joint consensus regarding appropriate items of care. For the purposes of this

proffer, the term “vaccine-related” is as described in respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report filed on June

29, 2017. All items of compensation identified in the agreed upon life care plan are supported

by the evidence, and are illustrated by the chart entitled Tab A: Items of Compensation for

Donna Scamby Powers, attached hereto as Tab A.1 Respondent proffers that petitioner should

1 Tab A illustrates the annual benefits provided by the agreed upon life care plan. The annual benefit years run from the date of judgment up to the first anniversary of the date of judgment, and every year thereafter up to the anniversary of the date of judgment. 1 Case 1:15-vv-01096-UNJ Document 36 Filed 07/14/17 Page 2 of 5

be awarded all items of compensation set forth in the agreed upon life care plan and illustrated

by the chart attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees.

B. Lost Future Earnings

The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, Donna Scamby Powers has

suffered a past loss of earnings and will continue to suffer a loss of earnings in the future.

Therefore, respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded lost past and future earnings as

provided under the Vaccine Act, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Respondent proffers that the

appropriate award for petitioner’s lost past and future earnings is $618,595.00. This amount

reflects that the award for lost future earnings has been reduced to net present value. Petitioner

agrees.

C. Pain and Suffering

Respondent proffers that petitioner should be awarded $173,968.00 in actual and

projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that the award for projected pain and

suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner

D. Past Un-reimbursable Expenses

Petitioner represents that she has not incurred any past un-reimbursable expenses related

to her vaccine-related injury.

E. Medicaid Lien

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2017).

Powers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Powers v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a