Powers v. Powers

33 A.D. 126, 53 N.Y.S. 346
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 1, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 33 A.D. 126 (Powers v. Powers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Powers v. Powers, 33 A.D. 126, 53 N.Y.S. 346 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1898).

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.:

This action is brought to procure a decree of separation on the ground of abandonment.

It appears that shortly after the separation of the parties they entered into a formal agreement whereby the parties mutually [127]*127agreed to live separate and apart. By this agreement a trustee for the plaintiff was appointed and the defendant agreed to pay to such trustee a certain sum of money per month for the support of plaintiff and the child of the parties, and the custody of such child was given to the plaintiff.

It is difficult to see how this action can be maintained under these circumstances. Where the wife consents to the separation there is no abandonment. It is only where the husband deserts the wife without her consent and refuses to give her adequate and proper support, that an action for abandonment will lie. In the case at bar the parties have agreed to live apart, and consequently the separation is with the consent of the plaintiff and _ apparently is in accordance with hesr wishes. There can be no "abandonment under such circumstances.

If it is true that the defendant is living in adultery with another person, the plaintiff has a cause of action for divorce, but abandonment cannot be predicated thereon in view of the separation agreement.

We think, therefore, that the motion for alimony should have been denied and the plaintiff remitted to her rights under the agreement of separation.

Barrett, Rumsby, O’Brien and McLaughlin, JJ., concurred.

Order reversed and motion denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mullane v. Mullane
29 Misc. 2d 194 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Lebolt v. Lebolt
200 Misc. 704 (New York Family Court, 1951)
In re the Estate of Chandler
175 Misc. 1029 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1941)
Polakoff v. Polakoff
175 Misc. 354 (New York Supreme Court, 1940)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of Armond
174 Misc. 486 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1940)
Thompson v. Thompson
163 Misc. 946 (New York Supreme Court, 1937)
In re the Estate of Brown
153 Misc. 282 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1934)
In re the Estate of Stolz
145 Misc. 799 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1932)
Sigmund v. Sigmund
233 A.D. 214 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)
Mirizio v. Mirizio
212 A.D. 524 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
Rosenblatt v. Rosenblatt
209 A.D. 373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Drane v. Drane
207 A.D. 217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
Benesch v. Benesch
182 A.D. 221 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1918)
Reischfield v. Reischfield
100 Misc. 561 (New York Supreme Court, 1917)
Kingsbury v. Sternberg
178 A.D. 435 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Landes v. Landes
94 Misc. 486 (New York Supreme Court, 1916)
Landes v. Landes
154 N.Y.S. 1129 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Randolph v. Field
165 A.D. 279 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Kaufman v. Kaufman
158 A.D. 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)
Dennison v. Dennison
52 Misc. 37 (New York Supreme Court, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 A.D. 126, 53 N.Y.S. 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powers-v-powers-nyappdiv-1898.