Powers v. . Powers
108 N.E. 1095, 214 N.Y. 660, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1360
Opinion
Order affirmed, without costs, on the ground that the matter was discretionary with the Supreme . Court; no opinion.
Concur: Willard Bartlett, Ch. J., Hiscock, Chase, Collin, Miller, Cardozo and Seabury, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Powers v. . Powers, 108 N.E. 1095, 214 N.Y. 660, 1915 N.Y. LEXIS 1360 (N.Y. 1915).
108 N.E. 1095 (Powers v. . Powers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Karlin v. Karlin
19 N.E.2d 669 (New York Court of Appeals, 1939)