Powers v. Powers

366 S.W.3d 609, 2012 WL 1243098, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 474
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 10, 2012·No. ED 97036·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Marc A. Powers (Father) appeals from the circuit court’s judgment finding that Father’s motion for a rehearing on his Motion for Emancipation, Abatement, to Enforce Judgment, for Accounting and to Modify was untimely filed; thus, the circuit court was without jurisdiction to conduct a rehearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value or serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powers v. Powers, 366 S.W.3d 609, 2012 WL 1243098, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 474 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

366 S.W.3d 609 (Powers v. Powers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Williams
366 S.W.3d 609 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)