Powers v. Illinois Central Railway Co.

66 N.W. 76, 97 Iowa 736
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided January 30, 1896·Published

Opinion

Kinne, J.

This action was brought to recover double damages for killing hogs. The amount in controversy does not exceed one hundred dollars; hence the case comes to this court upon a certificate of the trial judge. Code, section 3173. It appears that judgment was entered in the district court on October 10,1894. The certificate was made and filed on the eleventh day of October, 1894. Under repeated holdings of this court, this was too late. The certificate must be made when the cause is decided and judgment entered. Hershfield v. Bank, 39 Iowa, 699; Schultz v. Holbrook, 86 Iowa, 569 (53 N. W. Rep. 285); Foye v. Walker, 62 Iowa, 251 (17 N. W. Rep. 494); Nicely v. Rogers, 39 Iowa, 441; Brown v. Grundy County, 78 Iowa, 561 (43 N. W. Rep. 529). We cannot, therefore, consider the questions thus certified. — Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powers v. Illinois Central Railway Co., 66 N.W. 76, 97 Iowa 736 (iowa 1896).

66 N.W. 76 (Powers v. Illinois Central Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Nicely v. Rogers
39 Iowa 441 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1874)
Mitchell v. First National Bank
39 Iowa 699 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1874)
Foye v. Walker
17 N.W. 494 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1883)
Brown v. Grundy County
43 N.W. 529 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1889)
Schultz v. Holbrook
53 N.W. 285 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1892)