Powers v. Hines

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Powers v. Hines

113 A. 927, 270 Pa. 442, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 410

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 9, 1921

DocketAppeal, No. 42

StatusPublished

This text of 113 A. 927 (Powers v. Hines) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Powers v. Hines, 113 A. 927, 270 Pa. 442, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 410 (Pa. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Feazer,

The injury for which this action was instituted to recover compensation was the result of the same accident in which William A. Boud and his wife, Edith Boud, were injured and in whose case an opinion was filed February 14,1921. What was said there relative to the cause of the accident and plaintiff’s right to recover is applicable here and, for the reasons set forth in that opinion, the assignments of error here are overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Feazer,

The injury for which this action was instituted to recover compensation was the result of the same accident in which William A. Boud and his wife, Edith Boud, were injured and in whose case an opinion was filed February 14,1921. What was said there relative to the cause of the accident and plaintiff’s right to recover is applicable here and, for the reasons set forth in that opinion, the assignments of error here are overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

113 A. 927, 270 Pa. 442, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powers-v-hines-pa-1921.