Powers v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Powers v. Director of Revenue

434 S.W.3d 107, 2014 WL 2587294, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 653

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 10, 2014

DocketNo. ED 100318

StatusPublished

This text of 434 S.W.3d 107 (Powers v. Director of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Powers v. Director of Revenue, 434 S.W.3d 107, 2014 WL 2587294, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 653 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

[108]*108 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy J. Powers, Jr. (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the Director of Revenue on Appellant’s petition for review of the revocation of his driver’s license under Section 577.041.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment was supported by substantial evidence. Davis v. Director of Revenue, 346 S.W.3d 319, 322 (Mo.App.E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[108]*108 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Timothy J. Powers, Jr. (Appellant) appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the Director of Revenue on Appellant’s petition for review of the revocation of his driver’s license under Section 577.041.¹ We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment was supported by substantial evidence. Davis v. Director of Revenue, 346 S.W.3d 319, 322 (Mo.App.E.D.2011). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

434 S.W.3d 107, 2014 WL 2587294, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powers-v-director-of-revenue-moctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack