Powers v. Adams

374 S.W.2d 862
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJanuary 24, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 374 S.W.2d 862 (Powers v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Powers v. Adams, 374 S.W.2d 862 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

CULLEN, Commissioner.

William J. Powers, Jr., has filed in this Court a petition asking that an order of prohibition be entered against Chester D. Adams, Judge of the Fayette Circuit Court, enjoining him from enforcing or causing any other person to enforce an order of 35-day commitment for mental observation of Powers made on May 17,1947, and a judgment adjudicating Powers to be a person of unsound.mind and committing him to the U. S. Veterans’ Hospital at Lexington, entered June 9, 1947. The petition alleges various grounds upon which the order and judgment are claimed to be void.

The petitioner has been released from institutional confinement and the petition does not allege that the respondent or anyone else is threatening now to enforce the order and judgment (of course the order is functus officio, having long ago been enforced to the full extent possible). It appears that what the petitioner really desires is that the order and judgment be vacated. Such relief may be sought in the court that entered the order and judgment. Cadden v. Commonwealth, Ky., 242 S.W.2d 409. No reason has been shown why the circuit court remedy would not be adequate. This Court will not grant an order of prohibition where there is an adequate remedy in the circuit court.

The petition is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Powers v. United States
15 Cl. Ct. 702 (Court of Claims, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
374 S.W.2d 862, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/powers-v-adams-kyctapp-1964.