Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.

Supreme Court

Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.

278 U.S. 595, 49 S. Ct. 95

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 282 U.S. 175 →

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 10, 1928·No. No. 501; No. 528·Published

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; and

Petition for writ of certiorari -to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

The petitions for writs of certiorari in these cases are granted, the two cases to be heard as one.

Messrs. John D. Morgan and Alan M. Jackson for petitioners in No. 501. Messrs. Stephen J. Cox and Lynn A. Williams for respondent'in-No. 501. Messrs. Lynn A. Williams, Stephen J'.. Cox, Clifford C. Bradbury, and Albert G. McCabe for petitioner in No. 528. Mr. Charles E. Townsend for respondent in No. 528.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit; and

Petition for writ of certiorari -to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

The petitions for writs of certiorari in these cases are granted, the two cases to be heard as one.

Messrs. John D. Morgan and Alan M. Jackson for petitioners in No. 501. Messrs. Stephen J. Cox and Lynn A. Williams for respondent'in-No. 501. Messrs. Lynn A. Williams, Stephen J'.. Cox, Clifford C. Bradbury, and Albert G. McCabe for petitioner in No. 528. Mr. Charles E. Townsend for respondent in No. 528.

Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co., 278 U.S. 595, 49 S. Ct. 95 (1928).

Pincite

278 U.S. 595 (Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.