Power v. Woolley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Power v. Woolley

21 Ark. 462

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedJuly 15, 1860

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 21 Ark. 462 (Power v. Woolley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Power v. Woolley, 21 Ark. 462 (Ark. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Fairchild

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff Woolley declared on a note executed to him, but in the note, a copy of which is set out in the declaration, his name is spelled Wolley.

Power demurred for the variance between the names, the demurrer was overruled and judgment given for the note— Power appealed,, staying the execution by recognizance of himself and securities.

There is no variance properly pleaded, and there is none to plead.

Let the judgment be affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Fairchild

delivered the opinion of the court.

The plaintiff Woolley declared on a note executed to him, but in the note, a copy of which is set out in the declaration, his name is spelled Wolley.

Power demurred for the variance between the names, the demurrer was overruled and judgment given for the note— Power appealed,, staying the execution by recognizance of himself and securities.

There is no variance properly pleaded, and there is none to plead.

Let the judgment be affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 Ark. 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/power-v-woolley-ark-1860.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack