Power v. Woolley
21 Ark. 462
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiff Woolley declared on a note executed to him, but in the note, a copy of which is set out in the declaration, his name is spelled Wolley.
Power demurred for the variance between the names, the demurrer was overruled and judgment given for the note— Power appealed,, staying the execution by recognizance of himself and securities.
There is no variance properly pleaded, and there is none to plead.
Let the judgment be affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Power v. Woolley, 21 Ark. 462 (Ark. 1860).
21 Ark. 462 (Power v. Woolley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robert James Thibodeau v. United States
361 F.2d 443 (Fifth Circuit, 1966)
State v. Gorham
72 P.2d 656 (Utah Supreme Court, 1937)
Mooney v. State
210 S.W. 151 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1919)
Alexis v. United States
129 F. 60 (Fifth Circuit, 1904)
Rowe v. Palmer
29 Kan. 337 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1883)